BlockchainCryptocurrencyPrivacyStartupsTC

How a blockchain startup with 1M users is working to break your Google habit

The antitrust argument that says enormous tech needs breaking up to stop platforms abusing tournament and consumers in a two-faced role as seller and (manipulative) mart may only just be getting going on a mainstream political stage — but startups have been at the coal face of the combat against crushing platform energy for years.

Presearch, a 2017-founded, pro-privacy blockchain-based startup that’s using cryptocurrency tokens as an incentive to decentralize search — and thereby (it hopes) loosen Google’s grip on what Internet users find and experience — was conceived
out of the frustration, almost a decade before, of trying to build a local listing business only to have its efforts downranked by Google .

That business, Silicon Valley-based ShopCity.com, was founded in 2008 and offers local business search on Google’s home turf — operating sites like ShopPaloAlto.com and ShopMountainView.com — intended to promote local businesses by making them easier to find online.

But back in 2011 ShopCity complained publicly that Google’s search ranking systems were judging its content ‘low grade’ and relegating its listings pages to the unread deeps of search results. Listings which, nonetheless, had backing and purchase in from city governments, business associations and local newspapers.

ShopCity went on to complain to the U.S. Federal vend Commission (FTC), arguing Google was unfairly favoring its own local search products.

Going public with its complaint brought it into contact with sceptical segments of the tech press more accustomed to cheerleading Google’s rise than questioning the agency of its algorithms.

“We have developed a very comprehensive and holistic platform for community commerce, and that is why companies like The Buffalo News, owned by Berkshire Hathaway, have partnered up with us and paid substantial licensing fees to use our system,” wrote ShopCity co-founder Colin Pape, responding to a dismissive Gigaom article in November 2011 by trying to engage the author in comments below the fold.

“The fact that Google recently began copying our multi-domain model… and our in-community reach, is a good indication that we are onto something and not just a ‘two-bit upstart’,” Pape went on. “Google has stated that the local space is of superb importance to them… so they definitely have a motive to hinder others from becoming leaders, and if all it takes to stop an opposition from developing is a quick tweak to a domain profile, then why not?”

While the FTC went on to clear Google of anti-competitive behavior in the ShopCity case, Europe’s antitrust authorities have taken a very non-identical view about Mountain View’s algorithmic influence: The EU fined Google $2.73BN in 2017 after a lengthy investigations into its search comparison service which found, in a scenario similar to ShopCity’s contention, Google had demoted rival product search services and promoted its own competing comparison search product.

That preference was the first of a trio of multibillion EU fines for Google: a record-breaking $5BN fine for robot antitrust violations fast-followed in 2018. Earlier this year Google was stung a further $1.7BN for anti-competitive behavior related to its search ad brokering business.

“Google has given its own comparison shopping service an unlawful merit by abusing its dominance in general Internet search,” tournament commissioner Margrethe Vestager said briefing press on the 2017 antitrust preference. “It has harmed tournament and consumers.”

Of course fines alone — even those that exceed a billion dollars — won’t change anything where tech giants are concerned. But each EU antitrust preference requires Google to change its regional business practices to end the anti-competitive conduct too.

Commission authorities continue monitoring Google’s compliance in all three cases, leaving the door open for further interventions if its remedies are deemed inadequate (as rivals continue to complain). So the search giant remains on close watch in Europe, where its monopoly in search puts distinctive conditions on it not to break EU tournament rules in any other markets it operates in or enters.

There are wider signs, too, that increasing antitrust scrutiny of enormous tech — including the idea of breaking platforms up that’s suddenly inflated into a mainstream political talking point in the U.S. — is lifting a little of the crushing weight off of Google competitors.

One instance: Google quietly added privacy-focused search rival DuckDuckGo to the list of default search engines offered in its Chrome browser in around 60 markets earlier this year.

DDG is a veteran pro-privacy search motor Google rival that’s been growing usage steadily for years. Not that you’d have guessed that from looking at Chrome’s selective lists prior to the aforementioned silent update: From zero markets to ~60 overnight does look rather 🤨.

Rising antitrust danger could aid unlatch more previously battened down platform hatches in a path that’s helpful to even smaller Google rivals. Search startups like Presearch . (On the size front, it’s just passed a million registered users — and says monthly active users for its beta are ~250k. Early adopters skew energy user + crypto geek.)

Google’s dominance in search remains a given for now but a fresh twist is rattling tech giants thanks to a shift in tone around technology and antitrust, fuelled by societal concern about wider platform energy and impacts, that’s aligned with fresh academic thinking.

And now growing, cross-spectrum political appetite to regulate the Internet. Or, to put it another path, the tech backlash smells like a ballot winner.

That may seem counterintuitive when platforms have built massive consumer businesses by heavily marketing ‘free’ consumer-friendly services. But their shiny freebies have sprouted a hydra of ugly heads in recent years — whether it’s Facebook-fuelled, democracy-denting disinformation; YouTube-accelerated hate speech and extremism; or Twitter’s penchant for creating safe spaces for nazis to make friends and influence people.

Add to that: Omnipresent creepy ads that stalk people around the Internet. And a fast-flowing river of data breach scandals that have kept a steady spotlight on how the industry systematically plays fast and loose with people’s data.

European privacy regulations have further helped decloak adtech via an updated privacy legal framework that highlights how  very many faceless companies are lurking in the backdrop of the Internet, making cash by selling intelligence they’ve gleaned by spying on what web users are browsing.

And that’s just the consumer side. For little businesses and startups trying to contest with platform goliaths engineered and optimized to throw their bulk around, deploying massive networks and resources to tractor-beam and data mine anything — from product development; to usage and app trends; to their next startup acquisition — the feeling can be one of finish impotence. And, well, burning injustice.

“That was actually the real genesis moment behind [Presearch] — the realization of just how enormous Google is,” Pape tells TechCrunch, recounting the history of the ShopCity FTC complaint. “In 2011 we woke up one day and found out that 80-90% of our Google traffic had disappeared and all of these sites, some of which had been online for more than a decade and were being run in partnership with city governments and chambers of commerce, they were all basically demoted onto page eight of Google.

“Even if you typed them by name… Google had effectively, in their own backyard, shut down this local initiative.”

“We ended up participating in this [FTC] investigation and ultimately it cleared Google but we’ve been really aware of the mart energy that they have — and certainly what could be perceived as monopolistic practices,” he adds. “It’s an enormous contest. Anybody trying to do any sort of publishing or anything really on the web, Google is the gatekeeper.”

Now, with Presearch, Pape and co are hoping to go after Google in its techie backyard — of search.

Search, decentralized

Breaking the “Google habit” and opening up web users to a richer and more distinct field of search alternatives is the name of the game.

Presearch’s vision is a community-owned, preference-rich online playing field in the place where the Google search box normally squats; a sort of pluralist, collaborative commons that welcomes multiple search providers and rewards and surfaces community-curated search results to further diversity — encouraging Internet users to discover a democratized multiplicity of search results, not just the things enormous tech wants them to see.

Or as Pape puts it: “The ultimate vision is a fully decentralized search motor where the users are actually crawling the web as they surf — and where there’s kind of a framework for all of the participants within the ecosystem to be rewarded.”

This means that Presearch, which is developing a community-contributed search motor in addition to the federated search equipment platform, is competing with the third party search providers it offers access to.

But from its point of view it’s ‘the more the merrier’; Call it search choices for customizable courses.

“Or as we like to think of it, like a ‘Switzerland of search’,” says Pape, adding: “We do want to make sure it’s all about the user.”

Presearch’s startup advisor roster includes names that will be familiar to the wider blockchain community: Ethereum co-founder and founder of Decentral, Anthony Di Iorio; Rich Skrenta, founder and CEO of startup search motor Blekko (acquired by IBM Watson back in 2015); and industry lawyer, Addison Cameron-Huff.

“When you’re a producer on the web you realize how much regulate Google does really have over user traffic. Yet there are thousands of non-identical search resources that are out there that are subsisting underneath of Google,” continues Pape. “So we’re really trying to give them more of a platform that a lot of these non-identical providers — including DuckDuckGo, Qwant — could get behind to basically break that Google dependency and make it easier for them to have a direct relationship with the their audience.”

Of course they’re nowhere near challenging Google’s grip yet.

And like so many startups Presearch may never make good on the massive disruptive vision. It’s certainly got its work cut out. Being a startup in the Google-dominated search space makes the grade hostile properity odds exponentially harsher.

“Presearch is a highly-ambitious project,” the startup admits in its WhitePaper. “Google is one of the best companies in the world, and #1 on the Internet. Improving on their results, experience, and integrations will be no little feat — many even say it’s impossible. However, we believe that collectively the community can creatively and elegantly fulfill its own search needs from the ground up and create an unbelievable and open search motor that is aligned with the interests of humanity, not just one company.”

For now the beta product is, by Pape’s prepared admission, more of a “search utility” — benefaction a familiar search box where users can type their queries but atop a row of icons that allow them to quickly switch between non-identical search engines or services.

As well as benefaction Google search (the default search motor for now), DuckDuckGo is in the list, as is French search motor Qwant. Social platforms like Facebook and LinkedIn are also there to cater to people-focused queries. As is stuff like Wikipedia for community-edited dominance. In all Pape says the beta offers access to around 80 search services.

The basic idea for now is to let users specify the most appropriate search equipment for whatever bit of info they’re trying to locate. Aka that “stage playing field for a whole bunch of non-identical search resources” idea.

This does look like an energy equipment with niche appeal — Pape says about a quarter of active users are actively switching between non-identical engines; so ~75% are not — but which is being juiced, and here comes the crypto, by rewarding users for searching via the federated search field with a token named
PRE.

Pape says users are provided with a quarter token per presearch performed — up to a cap of eight tokens per day. The current mart value of the PRE token is around $0.05. (So the hardest working Presearchers could presumably call themselves ’40cents’.)

While there are ways for users to extract PRE from the platform if they wish, converting it to another cryptocurrency via community built exchanges, Pape says the intent is to create more of “a closed twist ecosystem”. Hence he says they’re busy construction a portal for users to be able to vend PRE tokens to advertisers.

“We will be promoting this closed twist ecosystem but it is an open standardized currency,” he notes. “It is tradable on various exchanges that community members have set up so there is the ability for people to convert the Presearch token to bitcoin which can then be converted to any local currency.”

“We see as well as opportunity to really build out an ecosystem of places for people to disburse the token as well,” he adds. “So that they can exchange it directly for either digital goods or material goods through an online platform. So that’s also in the works.”

As things stand Pape says most early adopters are ‘hodlers’. Which is to say they’re holding onto their PRE — speculating on as yet confidential token economics. (As it so often goes in the blockchain space — until, well, it suddenly doesn’t.)

“There is, as throughout the entire cryptocurrency space, a component of speculation,” he agrees. “People do tend to let their imaginations run wild so there’s kind of this absorbing confluence of that core base utility — where you basically have a token that is backed by advertising, something that you can really convert it to. And then there is this potential idea of the value of the network, and of having essentially some moment of stake in the value of that network.

“So there’s going to be this absorbing period over the next couple of years as the token economics change as we go from this nascent startup method into more of a full on operating method. Where the value will likely change.”

For advertisers the PRE token buys targeted ad impressions placed in front of Presearch users by being linked to keywords used by searchers (or “targeted, non-intrusive, keyword sponsorships” as the website explainer puts it).

This is the virtuous, privacy-respecting circle Presearch is hoping to create.

Pape makes a point of emphasizing there is “no tracking” of users’ searches. Which means there’s no profiling of Preseachers by Presearch itself — ads are being targeted contextually, per the current keyword search.

But of course if you’re clicking through to a third party like Google or Facebook that’s a whole other matter; and the grade tracking caveats enlistly.

Presearch’s bay not to be storing or otherwise tracking users’ searches has to be taken on trust for now. However it intends to fully open source the platform to ensure truly accountable transparency in the near future. (Pape says they’re hoping they’ll be able to do so in a year.)

In the meantime he notes that the founders make themselves available to users via a messaging faction on Telegram — contrasting that accessibility with the awesome unreachability of Google’s founders to the average (or really almost any) Google user.

In the modern age of messaging apps, and with their ecosystem’s community-construction imperatives, these founders are most certainly not operating in a vacuum.

Currently one PRE token buys an advertiser four ad impressions on the platform — which is one lever Presearch will be able to pull on to influence the value of the token as the ecosystem develops.

“Ultimately [impressions per token] could go to ten, a hundred,” suggests Pape. “That’s obviously going to change the token — and we’ll basically do that as we see the mart forces at work and how many people are actually willing to vend their tokens.

“We’ve currently got a beautiful mighty require side equation right now. It’s like three to one require to supply. a lot of the people that are earning tokens are not choosing to redeem them; they’re choosing to keep them in a wallet and hold onto them for the future. So it’s an absorbing test in tokenomics.”

“It’s super volatile, there’s so much sentiment that’s involved, that’s really the core chauffeur of the value,” he adds. “There’s no real fundamentals yet. Nobody has established any correlation between anything.”

Presearch began life as an internal search equipment built for use at the founders’ other company to reduce moment tracking down information online. And then the crypto boom caught their eyeball — and they saw a feasible incentive structure to encourage Google users to switch.

“We didn’t really see a go to mart strategy with it — search is a very challenging industry. But then when we really started looking at the cryptocurrency opportunity and the ability to potentially denominate an advertising platform in a token that could be utilized to incentivize people to switch we started thinking that it was possible; we put it out to the community, we got really good feedback on the need and on the messaging.”

a token sale followed, between July and November 2017, to lift funds for developing the platform — the obvious way for Presearch to grow a blockchain-based, community-sustaining, closed-twist ecosystem.

“One of the keys was really the ownership structure and making sure that all the participants within the ecosystem are aligned under one unit of account — which is the token. Vs having conflicting interests where there’s an equity incentive as well that may run counter to that token,” notes Pape.

The token sale raised an initial $7M but lucky timing meant Presearch was riding the cryptocurrency rollercoaster during an upward wave which meant funds appreciated to around $21M by the end of the sale period.

The first model of the platform was also launched in November of 2017, with the token itself launching at the end of the month.

Since then Pape says several hundred advertisers have participated in testing phases of the platform. a brand-new model of the platform is pending for launch “shortly” — with a non-identical ad unit which will arrive with a dozen “curated sponsors” on board. “There’s more brand exposure so we really want to be selective in the early days and making sure that we’re only partnering with aligned projects,” he adds.

Almost a year and a half on from the genuine platform launch Presearch has just made good on the number one community question: Browser extensions to make the platform easier to use for search.

User surveys showed the biggest reason people dropped out was ease of use, according to Pape.

The brand-new continuation is available for Chrome, fearless and Firefox browsers, and works to shave off usability friction. Previously beta users had to set Presearch as their homepage or remember to type its address into the URL bar before searching.

“There’s a really good alignment of the core community but ultimately it does come down to changing user habit and behavior and that is always challenging,” he adds. “This brand-new browser continuation enables them to use the browser URL field or the search field and basically access Presearch through the UI that they’re used to and that they’ve been demanding.

Around a quarter of sign-ups stick around and become active users, according to Pape — who dubs that “already really high”. The faction is expecting the brand-new browser extensions to fuel “significant” further growth.

“We are getting prepared to push it out to the users through email — [and anticipate] that we’re going to see a significant increase in the percentage of users utilizing it. And if that assumption holds through and everything really holds out we’re going to do a much more active push to grow the user base.”

They also launched an iOS Presearch app last year which taps into the voice search trend. Users can speak to search exact services with a library of sites that can be added to the app to enable deep searching of web resources, as well as apps running locally on the gagdet. (So, for instance, you could touch and tell it to ‘presearch Google Maps for London’ or ‘Spotify for Taylor fast’.)

tournament concerns attached to the convenience of voice search — which risks further flattening consumer preference and concentrating already highly concentrated mart energy given its focus on filtering options to return just one search result — is an venue of interest for antitrust regulators.

Europe’s antitrust majesty Vestager said in an interview earlier this year that she was trying to figure out “how to have tournament when you have voice search”. So perhaps Presearch’s federated platform reach offers a glimpse of a feasible solution.

intercontinental community vs Google

Pape sums up the overall competitive positioning that Presearch is shooting for as “Google for usage, DuckDuckGo for positioning”.

“We have been focused on the cryptocurrency community but there’s a really enormous opportunity to aid all these other content providers, internet service providers,” he argues. “There’s all this traffic that is happening and it’s currently defaulting over to Google with really no compensation to the publishers — or to the tech provider. And so we’re going to be going after those opportunities beautiful aggressively to get people to basically replace Google as the default that they use if they’re linking in an article to some more information or if they are an isp and they have an error page that shows up if somebody types in an url wrong or types in a mysterious query or something. Rather than have it go to Google, have it go to Presearch.”

Trying to make crypto more accessible is another focus. So there’s a built-in wallet to store PRE tokens — meaning users don’t have to have their own wallet set up to commence earning crypto. (Though of course they can move PRE into a non-identical wallet if/when they want.)

“As far as geographies go it’s an intercontinental audience but there’s a beautiful heavy contingent of users in Central and South America… Mexico, Brazil, Venezuela,” he adds, discussing where early interest has been coming from. “There’s a lot of crypto adoption that’s happening down there due to this [combination] where they’re super tech savvy, they’ve got really superb infrastructure, but they are still in a developing nation. So any of these types of crypto opportunities are very significant to them.”

While Google remains the staple default search option Presearch does offer its own search motor — leaning on third party APIs for search results.

Pape says the plan is to switch from Google to this motor as the default down the line. Albeit they can’t justify the switch yet.

“We want to provide users with the best search results to commence,” he concedes, before adding: “Up until just recently Google’s results were certainly superior; now we think we’ve got something that is actually quite competitive.”

He couches the Presearch motor as “very similar to DuckDuckGo” but with a couple of “distinctive features” — including an endless scroll view, rather than having search results paginated. (“As you’re scrolling it will automatically refresh the results.”)

“But the biggest thing really is that we have these open source community packages so anybody can submit to us a package that would get triggered by certain keywords and basically show up with results at the top of the search.”

an instance of one of these community packages can be seen by conducting a presearch for “bitcoin” — which returns the below block of curated info related to the cryptocurrency above the rest of the search results:

Another instance is currency conversions. When a currency conversion is typed into Presearch as a search query in the correct format (using relevant acronyms like USD and CAD) the query will surface a currency converter built by community members.

“It’s basically enabling anybody who knows HTML or Javascript to participate within the search ecosystem and add value to Presearch,” adds Pape.

The ultimate goal with the Presearch motor is to offer fully community-powered search where users not only create content packages and build out wider utility that can be served for particular keywords/searches but also curate these packages too.

The aim is also to have the community supervise the entire process — such as by voting on what package should be the default where there are conflicting packages; and/or voting to approve package updates — much like Wikipedia editors work together on editing the online encyclopedia’s entries.

Pape notes that users would still be able to customize their own search results, such as by browsing the full suite of approved packages and selecting those that best meet their needs.

“The whole idea of the search motor is really more about user preference and giving them the ability to actively personalize their search results, and select which contributors within the ecosystem they want to assist,” he adds.

Of course Presearch is a very long path off that grand vision of wholly-community-powered search. So for now community packages are being curated by its core dev faction.

Nor is it the first startup to dream enormous of community-powered and owned search. Not by a long, long chalk. It’s an idea that’s been kicked around the block many times before, even as Google’s dominating grip on search has cemented itself into place.

The stage of crowdsourced effort required to generate differentiating value in the Google-dominated search space has proved a stumbling block for similarly minded startups wanting to contest head to head with Mountain View. And, clearly, Presearch will need a much larger user base if it’s to build and sustain enough community contributions to make its motor a compellingly helpful product vs the usual search giant suspects.

But, as with Wikipedia, the idea is to keep construction utility and momentum in growing increments. With — in its case — crypto rewards, backed by $21M in initial token sales, as the carrot to encourage community participation and contribution. So the founder thinking sums to: ‘If we build it and pay people they’ll come’.

It’s worth noting that despite the community-focused escapade Presearch’s current corporate structure is a canadian corporation.

It does have a plan to transition to a foundation in future — with Pape envisaging distributing ~90%+ of the revenue that flows through the ecosystem to the various constituents and participants (searchers; node operators; curators; subject matter experts contributing to information indexes etc, etc), and retaining around 10% to fund operating the platform entity itself.

This is a structure familiar to many blockchain projects. Though Presearch is perhaps a bit unusual by being initially incorporated as a business.

“a lot of the crypto projects have done this foundation way [right off the bat] but really it’s more about taxes and it’s more about jurisdictional arbitrage and trying to minimize the potential regulatory danger,” Pape suggests. “For us, because of the path that we launched it, and our legal advisor [Cameron-Huff] — the founding lawyer for Ethereum — he gave us some really good counsel right out of the gate. And we’ve treated it as a business.

“We think we’ve got a really mighty legal position and so we really didn’t need to do the offshore stuff at first. We figured we would get the usage and build up the core token economics. And then switch to an actual truly community-governed foundation, rather than a foundation in name which is governed by all the insiders — which is really what most of the crypto projects currently have done.”

For now Pape remains the sole shareholder of Presearch. Transitioning that sole ownership into the future foundation structure is likely a year out by his reckoning. 

“One of the key concepts behind the project is ultimately providing an open source, transparent resource that is treated like more of an utility, that the community can provide input on and supervise,” he adds. “So we’re looking at all the non-identical government options.

“There’s a lot of technology being developed within the blockchain space right now. And some best practices that are starting to emerge. So we figured that we would give it a little while for that technology and those practices to mature and then we would be able to do that transition.”

Source
TechCrunch
Tags

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Close